Crilix Posted February 6, 2006 Report Share Posted February 6, 2006 Bah, just when I thought I had my computer how I wanted it, my monitor goes on the fritz. It's shadowing pretty horribly, at 1600x1200 I have about three (consecutively fading) cursors within an inch on my screen. This is making graphic stuff really hard. The odd thing, is that when I get ingame in CoD2 and exit, it's all fine. If anyone knows how I can fix this, let me know. Otherwise... Time for a new monitor! I'm gunna go LCD, but I have exactly no idea what I need to look for that'll produce good gaming results. I've played CS on an LCD a while back and it was kinda blurry and hard to concentrate on (Reffered to as ghosting?). There was a thread at some point that talked about this stuff, but I can't seem to find it. If I remember correctly, I need a low response time (4-6ms?) to make most games playable. If someone can let me know what I'll need and how much I'd be looking to spend it'd be appreciated. Thanks. -Cril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colossus Posted February 6, 2006 Report Share Posted February 6, 2006 any LCD's currently advertising less than like 10 or 12ms response time is not advertising the TRUE response time. that low response time is referred to as 4ms (gtg) meaning Grey to Grey. Wherein their true response time is generally up around 10-12+. With this I definately say you are goin to get what you pay for. Buy cheap, you'll get fucked. Buy Expensive, you'll be happy. I like Sony and NEC for monitors so Id suggest looking into those personally. You may not get the "Ideal" response time out of your monitor but if you are dead set to spending money on an lcd for both its sexyness and its clearing up of desk spaceness its worth it to spend the extra cash, get something of quality, and put up with as little "ghosting" as possible. Ghosting just isnt the concentration or blurryness either.. or rather that is whats being interpreted. However the response time affects what you could call "monitor lag" its how quick it refreshs the colors in yoru screen and what not. So what is ACTUALLY happening is you could be shooting where no one is. It may show on your screen, but both the Server AND your computer see differently. Also prolonged gaming on an LCD has been known to be hard on the eyes and im sure worse than that. However I personally would play on a good LCD. Infact I have done it and will do it in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etru_scan Posted February 6, 2006 Report Share Posted February 6, 2006 Whatever you do, get a monitor with an advertised response time of no more than 8-10ms if you want to be 'sure' it's not going to ghost on you. I dont know which brands are better or worse for misguiding advertisement, but no doubt it goes on. My monitor at work is a dell 19" and the response time is.. 20ms, i think ? Maybe a little more. Anyways, it barely ghosts, but it does do it to a noticable degree - If you find somethign under 10, you'll be fine. Graphically speaking, i bet any decent name LCD is goign to do fine with color reproduction, fine enough, anyways. I still dont think they're as good as CRTs, but thats me. GL ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 One thing to keep in mind is that you need to run all your games you want to play at the native resolution of the monitor you get, and I concur with all that is said in the above posts, I got the 17" Sony with Xbrite technology and its wicked. blue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colossus Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 super bright technology of the LCD's is a very liked bonus of mine.. for those of us that get picked off in CS or DoD from the dark spots.. with the super bright lcd's you can see anyone anywhere! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parker Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 running native resolutions is critical. 17" and 19" run 1280x1024. 20" runs 1600x1200 I think. and the widescreen ones run all sorts of different resolutions. most new vid cards can handle 1280x1024 at max settings, but only a few can handle 1600x1200 at max settings these days( cough FEAR cough). so keep that in mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 i have a samsung syncmaster 910mp and im definatly happy with it so far. http://www.priceok.it/images/products/06265.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crilix Posted February 9, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks for the imput everyone, I really aprreciate it. When I go to look at LCDs, though, is there a way for me to judge it based on the provided specs, or is testing it the best option? Or, more specifically, when looking at an LCD what am I looking for in the specifications? What are the categories that matter, what do they mean, and what values do I need for get good performance? I suspect I will end up spending $400-$600 on an LCD. Is that even enough? I browsed a few online stores, and the majority of monitors are within that range. There are some above and below, but I don't want to spend to much/too little. -Cril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colossus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 That sounds about good to me. no less for sure, and well more is better but 600 fromw hat ive viewed is a decent lcd imho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parker Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 find a few monitors that catch your eye and then cut an paste the make/model into google and follow the pasted words with review and you can find out how PC mags/webpages rate them. ....and they explain the specs better usually Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crilix Posted February 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Hrm... I just found a 20" Samsung on sale at Ye Olde Futureshoppe for $100 off. It's $600 before tax and all that junk, which seems pretty cheap for a 20" LCD. It also says it has a 5ms response time... I'm really trying to find some reviews for it, but am having little luck... There are a few user submitted/casual reviews that are encouraging. I'd still like to see a review from a know hardware site with someone who knows what he's talking about. Opinions? 20" Samsung 204B -Cril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etru_scan Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 Actually, looks pretty good chris. The reviews are kinda funny, i suspect some of them are plants " great monitor! gushgushgush great monitor! " etc.. but anyways, given the feautres such as nice response time, good contrast ratio, resolution presets and the mgic swivel thing, on top of a 3 year warranty.. I'd say your money is safe.. Not to mention the fact that it's a twenny. GOOD call there, really. There aren't many places to go from there that wont cost you an arm and a leg, so this seems like a great buy. GL buddy ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderOnIce Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 And your graphics card is going to be ok to push the native resolution on that monitor for games. It's probably going to be 1680 x 1050 like mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crilix Posted February 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 Well, it looks pretty good, I'm tempted. The thing is, what about dead pixels? How much of a problem are they? I haven't used an LCD with a dead pixel before, but I'd imagine they'd get quite annoying. The Samsung warranty states that a LCD with "less than 6 damaged pixels is considered regular". One would be annoying, but FIVE and it isn't even covered under warranty? That doesn't sit well with me. If I get it through Futureshop, I think I'd only have a 30-day return period. Bah. How common is this problem, is there a way to fix it, and what would it cost? I know it doesn't have to do with that specific model, but just LCDs in general. I don't want to pay up $600 for an imperfect product that I can't get fixed or returned. If I can get one through Costco, than it won't be a problem due to their 'no questions asked' return policy. Otherwise... Do I shop around for a CRT? -Cril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderOnIce Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Eep. I never even thought of that when I bought my lcd. Go costco, man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.